Account for energy stored in a gravitational field and in a stretched or compressed spring
Several sessions: a laboratory investigation with low-voltage or mechanical apparatus only, modeled problems checked in SI units, independent practice and a written explanation. g = 9.8 m/s² throughout.
Ohio learning standards this draft targets
science-2018:P.E.1science-2018:P.E.2
Read the standard text
science-2018:P.E.1 Gravitational potential energy
science-2018:P.E.2 Energy in springs
Provisional targets. Clause-by-clause educational review is still pending.
📘Section 1 · LearnLearn the idea
The line rises from (0, 0) to (0.40 m, 20 N), so its slope is 20 N ÷ 0.40 m = 50 N/m, the spring constant. At a stretch of 0.20 m the force is 10 N, and the triangle under the line from 0 to 0.20 m has area ½ × 0.20 m × 10 N = 1.0 J, the elastic potential energy stored, equal to ½ × 50 × 0.20² = 1.0 J.
Learning goal: Explain gravitational potential energy as energy stored in the field of a system of attracting masses, calculate it near Earth's surface and for widely separated bodies, read the spring constant and the stored energy from a force vs. distance graph, and calculate the elastic potential energy of a spring stretched or compressed a given distance.
Energy belongs to the system, not to one object. In earlier courses you calculated gravitational potential energy with mgh and spoke of the ball "having" potential energy. In this course the picture is refined. When a ball and Earth pull on each other, both change speed (Earth by an amount far too small to notice), yet neither one is handing its own energy to the other. The energy is exchanged with the gravitational field that the pair shares, and the amount held there is what we call gravitational potential energy. A single mass alone in space still has its own gravitational field, but there is no second object in that field to interact with, so there is no gravitational interaction energy to speak of. Gravitational potential energy belongs to the system of two or more attracting masses. Pulling the masses apart takes work against their attraction, and that work is stored in the field; letting them come together draws the stored energy back out, usually as kinetic energy. A ball thrown upward is slowing because its kinetic energy is flowing into the ball-Earth field; as it falls, the field returns that energy as kinetic energy. Saying "the ball has 29 J of potential energy" is a convenient shorthand, but the honest statement is "the ball-Earth system has 29 J more energy stored in its field than when the ball was on the floor".
Near Earth's surface: ΔU = mgΔh. When an object moves through a height change Δh that is tiny compared with Earth's radius (6.37 × 10⁶ m), the gravitational field strength g is very nearly constant at 9.8 N/kg, and the change in the system's gravitational potential energy is ΔU = mgΔh. Two conditions matter. First, the formula gives a change; you are free to call any level "zero" and only differences have physical meaning. Second, it is an approximation that fails when Δh is large enough for g to change noticeably. Worked model: a 2.0 kg book is lifted 1.5 m from the floor to a shelf. ΔU = (2.0 kg)(9.8 N/kg)(1.5 m) = 29.4 J. The person's muscles transferred 29.4 J into the book-Earth field. When the book later falls, the field transfers 29.4 J back out, and (ignoring air resistance) the book reaches the floor with 29.4 J of kinetic energy.
Large separations: U = −GMm/r. For a satellite hundreds of kilometers up, or the Moon, g is not constant and mgΔh overestimates the energy. The general expression for the gravitational potential energy of two point-like masses M and m whose centers are a distance r apart is U = −GMm/r, with G = 6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg². Here the zero of energy is chosen at infinite separation, so every bound system has negative U; less negative means more energy stored in the field. The change when a body moves from r₁ to r₂ is ΔU = GMm(1/r₁ − 1/r₂). Worked model: how much energy must go into the field to raise an 800 kg satellite from Earth's surface (r₁ = 6.37 × 10⁶ m) to a 400 km altitude (r₂ = 6.77 × 10⁶ m)? Using M = 5.97 × 10²⁴ kg: ΔU = (6.67 × 10⁻¹¹)(5.97 × 10²⁴)(800)(1/(6.37 × 10⁶) − 1/(6.77 × 10⁶)) = 2.95 × 10⁹ J. The near-surface formula gives mgΔh = (800)(9.8)(4.0 × 10⁵) = 3.14 × 10⁹ J, about 6 % too high, because g falls off as the satellite climbs. (Putting the satellite into orbit also requires kinetic energy, which this calculation does not include.)
Elastic potential energy and the force vs. distance graph. A spring, bungee cord or rubber band stores energy when stretched or compressed from its relaxed length. For an ideal spring kept within its proportional (straight-line) range, the restoring force is proportional to the change in length: F = kΔx, where k is the spring constant in newtons per meter (N/m) and Δx is the distance stretched or compressed from the relaxed length. Plot force on the vertical axis and distance on the horizontal axis and you get a straight line through the origin. The slope of that line is the spring constant k. The area under the line, from zero out to a stretch Δx, is the work done stretching the spring, which is the energy stored in it: a triangle of base Δx and height kΔx, so ΔE_elastic = ½ k Δx². The area, not F × Δx, is the right calculation because the force is not constant: it grows from zero as the spring is pulled, and as a spring oscillates back and forth the force on the attached mass keeps changing, largest at the extremes and zero at the relaxed length. Worked model: a spring with k = 50 N/m is stretched 0.20 m. The force at that stretch is F = (50 N/m)(0.20 m) = 10 N. The stored energy is ½(50)(0.20)² = 1.0 J, which is exactly the area of the triangle under the graph from 0 to 0.20 m: ½ × 0.20 m × 10 N = 1.0 J. Stretching it to 0.40 m stores ½(50)(0.40)² = 4.0 J, four times as much for twice the stretch, because the energy depends on the square of Δx.
Misconception: doubling the stretch doubles the energy. It doubles the force but quadruples the energy, because the extra stretch happens against a larger force. The triangle on the graph shows this directly: doubling the base also doubles the height.
Designing with the energy account. A bungee drop can be designed with calculations alone. Suppose a 0.060 kg egg in a harness is dropped from a platform 3.0 m above the floor on a cord of relaxed length 1.5 m, and the goal is to stop it 0.30 m above the floor. At the lowest point the egg is momentarily at rest, so all the energy that left the egg-Earth field, mgΔh with Δh = 2.7 m, has gone into the cord: (0.060)(9.8)(2.7) = 1.59 J. The cord has stretched Δx = 2.7 − 1.5 = 1.2 m, so ½ k (1.2)² = 1.59 J gives k = 2.2 N/m. At the lowest point the elastic force is kΔx = (2.205)(1.2) = 2.6 N upward while the egg's weight is 0.59 N downward, so the net force is strongly upward and the egg accelerates back up; the cord must be attached firmly and the egg will bounce. Real cords are not ideal springs, so a test drop from a lower height comes first and the design is revised from the data.
Investigation: measure k and the stored energy. Materials: a steel spring, a second spring of different stiffness (or a length of bungee shock cord), a rubber band for comparison, a ring stand and clamp, a meter stick, a set of slotted masses up to 500 g, and safety glasses. Steps: hang the spring, record its relaxed length, then add masses one at a time and record the total stretch for each, keeping well below the point where the spring stops returning to its original length. Plot force (mg) against stretch. A result that supports the model is a straight line through the origin; its slope is k, and the area under it out to any stretch equals ½ k Δx². Repeat with the second spring or the cord, check how straight its graph is before quoting a k, and compare the k values (designing, building and testing a bungee drop from a measured k is the performance task in the lesson on elastic forces and Hooke's law). Last, load and then unload the rubber band, recording the stretch at each step both ways. What the model cannot show: a rubber band's graph curves, so it has no single k and ½kΔx² does not apply to it, and its unloading curve lies below its loading curve. The area under the loading curve is the work put in, the area under the unloading curve is the work recovered, and the area between them is the energy that warms the band during each cycle. Never release a loaded spring so that it snaps toward a face; unload masses by hand.
✏️Section 2 · ModelWork through the examples
Worked example 1 — an energy account for lifting and lowering. A 4.0 kg toolbox is lifted 0.80 m onto a bench and later lowered to the floor. Lifting: ΔU = (4.0)(9.8)(0.80) = 31.4 J flows from the person into the toolbox-Earth field. Lowering slowly: the field gives up 31.4 J, and because the box does not speed up, that energy is transferred into the person's arms (and ultimately to thermal energy), not into kinetic energy. The field is the store; neither the box nor Earth alone is the source or the receiver.
Worked example 2 — a satellite, two ways. For the 800 kg satellite raised 400 km, the field formula gives ΔU = GMm(1/r₁ − 1/r₂) = (6.67 × 10⁻¹¹)(5.97 × 10²⁴)(800)(1.570 × 10⁻⁷ − 1.477 × 10⁻⁷ m⁻¹) = 2.95 × 10⁹ J, while mgΔh gives 3.14 × 10⁹ J. The near-surface formula overestimates because it assumes g stays at 9.8 N/kg all the way up, whereas at 400 km the field strength is already smaller. The sign is positive in both cases: energy went into the field because the masses were separated.
Worked example 3 — a compressed spring. A spring with k = 300 N/m is compressed 0.15 m in a toy launcher. Force at full compression: F = (300)(0.15) = 45 N. Energy stored: ½(300)(0.15)² = 3.375 J ≈ 3.4 J. If the graph of force vs. compression were drawn, it would be a straight line from (0, 0) to (0.15 m, 45 N), and the triangle under it has area ½(0.15)(45) = 3.375 J, the same answer.
Worked example 4 — reading a graph. A force vs. stretch graph for an unknown spring passes through (0.10 m, 8.0 N) and (0.30 m, 24 N). Slope = (24 − 8.0)/(0.30 − 0.10) = 80 N/m, so k = 80 N/m. Energy stored at 0.30 m: ½(80)(0.30)² = 3.6 J. Energy stored between 0.10 m and 0.30 m: 3.6 − ½(80)(0.10)² = 3.6 − 0.4 = 3.2 J, which is the area of the trapezoid under the line between those two stretches.
🧩Section 3 · DoPractice, demonstrate, and explain
Representation task: graph and annotate. Draw a force vs. stretch graph for a spring with k = 80 N/m from 0 to 0.25 m, with labeled axes in newtons and meters. Shade the area under the line up to 0.25 m, calculate it (½ × 0.25 m × 20 N = 2.5 J) and check that ½ k Δx² gives the same value. Add a second line for a stiffer spring (k = 160 N/m) and write two sentences comparing the slopes and the areas at the same stretch. Then draw a separate energy bar chart for a ball thrown upward at three moments (release, halfway up, top), showing kinetic energy and field energy as bars whose total stays constant.
Independent performance: measure a spring constant and predict a stretch. Carry out the hanging-mass investigation with a steel spring whose force vs. stretch graph you have checked is a straight line, and write a report. Success criteria: a data table with at least five mass-stretch pairs in SI units; a force vs. stretch graph with a best-fit line and its slope stated as k in N/m; the stored energy at the largest stretch calculated both from the area and from ½ k Δx², with the two values agreeing; a prediction of the stretch for a mass you did not test, checked by measurement, with the percent difference; one paragraph explaining why gravitational potential energy is described as belonging to the mass-Earth system and not to the mass alone; and a statement of one thing the straight-line model cannot show about the real spring, or about the rubber band if you tested one.
✅Section 4 · Check7-question lesson practice test
An adult may read the prompts aloud. Answer independently with words, objects, drawings or a demonstration before opening the answer guide. Award 1 point for a correct result or claim and 1 point for a matching explanation or demonstration; where a question asks only for a result (a corrected sentence, a spelling, a count), a fully correct result earns both points, and the answer guide shows what a complete response contains. Record prompting separately. The total (two points per question) is local practice feedback, not an Ohio proficiency level.
Problem 1
A student says a rock on a cliff 'has' gravitational potential energy. Rewrite the statement in the language of fields and explain why a rock alone in deep space would have none.
Show worked solution
Gravitational potential energy is stored in the gravitational field of a system of attracting masses, so the accurate statement is that the rock-Earth system has energy stored in its field because the rock and Earth have been separated. A rock alone in space is not part of a system of attracting masses; there is no other mass for it to interact with, so there is no interaction energy of the kind this course calls gravitational potential energy (the rock still has its own field). Only changes in the system's separation change the stored energy.
Problem 2
A 0.50 kg ball is thrown straight up and rises 3.2 m. How much energy is transferred into the ball-Earth field during the rise, and where did that energy come from?
Show worked solution
ΔU = mgΔh = (0.50 kg)(9.8 N/kg)(3.2 m) = 15.7 J, about 16 J. It came from the ball's kinetic energy: the ball slows as it rises because its kinetic energy is transferred into the field, not because Earth 'takes' the energy. Neither the ball nor Earth is the source; the energy moves from the kinetic form into the field of the system.
Problem 3
Why does mgΔh give the wrong answer for the energy needed to lift an 800 kg satellite from Earth's surface (r = 6.37 × 10⁶ m) to an altitude of 400 km, and in which direction is it wrong? Use M = 5.97 × 10²⁴ kg and G = 6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg² to compare the two values.
Show worked solution
mgΔh assumes the field strength g stays 9.8 N/kg over the whole climb. Over 400 km the distance from Earth's center grows from 6.37 × 10⁶ m to 6.77 × 10⁶ m and the field weakens, so less work is needed than mgΔh predicts. The general formula ΔU = GMm(1/r₁ − 1/r₂) gives 2.95 × 10⁹ J for the 800 kg satellite (r₂ = 6.77 × 10⁶ m) compared with 3.14 × 10⁹ J from mgΔh; the near-surface formula overestimates, by about 6 %.
Problem 4
On a force vs. distance graph for a spring, what does the slope represent and what does the area under the line represent? Give the units of each.
Show worked solution
The slope is the spring constant k, in newtons per meter (N/m): it tells how much force is needed per meter of stretch or compression. The area under the line from zero to a given stretch is the work done on the spring, which is the elastic potential energy stored, in joules (J). Because the graph is a straight line through the origin, the area is a triangle, ½ × Δx × kΔx = ½ k Δx².
Problem 5
A spring with k = 120 N/m is compressed 0.25 m. Calculate the stored energy, then explain why compressing it 0.50 m would store more than twice as much.
Show worked solution
ΔE = ½ k Δx² = ½(120 N/m)(0.25 m)² = 3.75 J. At 0.50 m the energy is ½(120)(0.50)² = 15 J, four times as much, because energy depends on the square of the compression: the second 0.25 m of compression is done against a larger force (rising from 30 N to 60 N) than the first (rising from 0 to 30 N), so it stores three times as much energy as the first 0.25 m did.
Problem 6
A force vs. distance graph shows a spring oscillating between a compression of 0.10 m and a stretch of 0.10 m. Describe how the force on the attached mass changes during one cycle and where it is zero.
Show worked solution
The force is proportional to the displacement from the relaxed length, so it is largest in magnitude at the two extremes (0.10 m compressed and 0.10 m stretched), always directed back toward the relaxed length, and it passes through zero each time the spring is at its relaxed length. The force is therefore changing continuously; it is not a constant push or pull, which is why energy is found from the area under the graph rather than from force times distance.
Problem 7
In the bungee design, the elastic force at the lowest point was 2.6 N while the egg's weight was 0.59 N. What does this comparison tell you about the egg's motion at that instant, and why does the design still need a test drop?
Show worked solution
At the lowest point the upward elastic force is about 4.4 times the downward weight (2.6 N ÷ 0.59 N), so the net force is upward and the egg is accelerating upward even though it is momentarily at rest; it will rebound. The calculation assumed an ideal spring with a constant k and no energy loss, but real cords are not perfectly linear and dissipate some energy, so the predicted stretch may be off. A test from a lower height gives data to critique and revise the design before the full drop.