High school · ScienceAbout 150 minutes
ScienceHigh schoolAbout 150 minutes

Evaluate renewable and nonrenewable energy resources by their geology, efficiency, availability and the cost of mining and extraction, using Ohio's coal, oil and gas

Several sessions: instruction with the diagram, a safe investigation, modeled examples with real or model data, independent practice and a written explanation.

Ohio learning standards this draft targets

science-2018:PG.ER.1

Read the standard text

science-2018:PG.ER.1 Energy resources

Provisional targets. Clause-by-clause educational review is still pending.

Section 1 · LearnLearn the idea
Typical, approximate conversion efficiencies: coal power plants about 33 to 40 percent, gas combined-cycle plants about 50 to 60 percent, wind turbines about 35 to 45 percent of the wind energy passing the blades (physical limit about 59 percent), solar panels about 15 to 22 percent, and ground-source heat pumps moving about 3 to 4 units of heat per unit of electricity using shallow ground at roughly 10 to 13 °C. Individual machines vary; efficiency alone does not decide which source is best.Typical, approximate conversion efficiencies: coal power plants about 33 to 40 percent, gas combined-cycle plants about 50 to 60 percent, wind turbines about 35 to 45 percent of the wind energy passing the blades (physical limit about 59 percent), solar panels about 15 to 22 percent, and ground-source heat pumps moving about 3 to 4 units of heat per unit of electricity using shallow ground at roughly 10 to 13 °C. Individual machines vary; efficiency alone does not decide which source is best.Approximate conversion efficiency and anOhio geology linkSourceEfficiency (approx.)Ohio linkCoal power plant(nonrenewable)33 to 40% of fuelenergy to electricityPennsylvanian coal,eastern andsoutheastern OhioGas combined-cycleplant (nonrenewable)50 to 60%Utica and PointPleasant shale,eastern OhioWind turbine(renewable)35 to 45% of windenergy throughblades; limit about59%Open, flat land innorthwestern OhioSolar panel(renewable)15 to 22% of sunlightstriking itRooftops and fieldsstatewideGround-source heatpump (renewable heat)3 to 4 units of heatper unit ofelectricityShallow ground atroughly 10 to 13 °C
Typical, approximate conversion efficiencies: coal power plants about 33 to 40 percent, gas combined-cycle plants about 50 to 60 percent, wind turbines about 35 to 45 percent of the wind energy passing the blades (physical limit about 59 percent), solar panels about 15 to 22 percent, and ground-source heat pumps moving about 3 to 4 units of heat per unit of electricity using shallow ground at roughly 10 to 13 °C. Individual machines vary; efficiency alone does not decide which source is best.

Learning goal: Classify energy resources as renewable or nonrenewable and explain the geology that produces fossil fuels; calculate and compare the efficiency of energy sources, including alternate energy sources; explain resource availability using the difference between a resource and a reserve; describe the main methods of mining and resource extraction and their environmental costs; and apply all of these to Ohio's coal, oil and natural gas and to alternatives available in Ohio.

Renewable and nonrenewable. A resource is renewable if nature replaces it at least as fast as people use it on a human timescale: sunlight, wind, flowing water, heat from the shallow ground, and biomass if it is regrown. A resource is nonrenewable if it forms far more slowly than it is used. Coal, oil and natural gas formed over millions of years, and uranium ore is a fixed amount of an element concentrated by geologic processes, so all are nonrenewable. The condition matters: wood is renewable only when forests are replanted at the rate they are cut, and groundwater used for geothermal systems is renewable only if it is not drawn down faster than it recharges.

The geology of fossil fuels. Coal forms from plant material that accumulated in swamps faster than it decayed, because waterlogged ground is low in oxygen. The plant debris became peat; burial under later sediment raised the temperature and pressure, driving off water and volatile compounds and concentrating carbon, so peat became lignite, then subbituminous and bituminous coal, and under stronger heat anthracite. A thick layer of peat compacts to a much thinner coal seam, often several to more than ten times thinner. Most of Ohio's coal lies in the Pennsylvanian-age rocks of eastern and southeastern Ohio, deposited about 320 to 300 million years ago in coastal swamps on the edge of the Appalachian Basin when Ohio lay near the equator. Ohio coal is bituminous and much of it is high in sulfur, which matters when it is burned. Oil and natural gas form from the remains of microscopic marine organisms buried in fine mud. With burial to a depth where temperatures reach roughly 60 to 120 °C, the organic matter is slowly converted to oil, and at higher temperatures to gas. The rock where this happens is the source rock, usually a dark shale. (Some natural gas also forms at shallow depth from microbes, and coal beds release gas too; the heated-plankton route is the main source of oil.) Oil and gas are less dense than water, so they migrate upward through permeable rock until an impermeable cap rock traps them in a porous reservoir rock such as sandstone or limestone: the conventional three-rock model. In unconventional shale deposits, such as the Utica, the oil and gas never left the source rock. Ohio had an early oil boom in the late 1880s and 1890s from the Ordovician Trenton Limestone around Lima, and a long history of gas production from the Silurian Clinton sandstone. Since about 2011, horizontal drilling combined with hydraulic fracturing has produced gas and oil from the Ordovician Utica and Point Pleasant shale in eastern Ohio, a source rock too tight to yield much by vertical wells.

Efficiency. Efficiency is useful energy out divided by energy in, as a percentage. Every conversion loses some energy, mostly as heat, and the losses multiply along a chain. A fully worked model: a coal power plant converts about 35 percent of the fuel's chemical energy to electricity (typical plants are roughly 33 to 40 percent), and suppose about 5 percent of that electricity is lost in transmission. From 1,000 MJ of coal, 1,000 × 0.35 = 350 MJ of electricity leave the plant and 350 × 0.95 = 332.5 MJ reach homes. The overall efficiency is 0.35 × 0.95 = 33.3 percent. If that electricity runs a light that turns 40 percent of it into light, only about 13 percent of the coal's energy becomes light. The lesson is that where energy is saved at the end of the chain, several times as much fuel is saved at the start.

Alternate energy sources and efficiency. A natural-gas combined-cycle plant, which uses the hot exhaust of a gas turbine to raise steam for a second turbine, reaches about 50 to 60 percent. Wind turbines capture roughly 35 to 45 percent of the kinetic energy of the wind passing through the blades; physics limits any turbine to about 59 percent. Typical solar panels convert about 15 to 22 percent of the sunlight that strikes them. Low efficiency is not the same as waste when the input is free and renewable, so a fair comparison also counts the fuel that does not have to be mined and the emissions not produced. Wind and solar vary with weather and time of day, so they are also compared by capacity factor, the actual output over a year divided by the output if the machine ran at full power all the time. A ground-source heat pump uses the steady temperature of the ground about 10 to 15 m down, roughly 10 to 13 °C (50 to 55 °F) in Ohio, to heat buildings in winter and cool them in summer; it moves about three to four units of heat for each unit of electricity it uses, because it moves heat rather than making it. That ratio is called the coefficient of performance; it is not an efficiency in the useful-out-over-energy-in sense used above, because most of the heat delivered comes from the ground, not from the electricity.

Resource availability. A resource is a concentration of a material in or on Earth in a form from which extraction is, or could one day be, economically feasible, whether it has been discovered yet or not; scattered atoms of an element spread through ordinary rock are not counted. A reserve is the part that is known and can be extracted profitably with present technology and prices. Reserves change even though the rock does not: the Utica shale gas was a resource for decades and became a reserve when horizontal drilling and fracturing made it economic. The reserve-to-production ratio estimates how long a reserve would last at the present rate, but it is a snapshot, not a forecast, because prices, technology and demand change. The same reasoning applies to mineral resources: Ohio produces salt from thick Silurian beds mined beneath Lake Erie, limestone for cement and construction, and sand and gravel from glacial deposits, and each is weighed by use against availability and demand.

Mining and resource extraction. Surface mining removes the overlying rock, the overburden, to reach shallow coal; it recovers most of the seam but disturbs large areas, and United States law since 1977 requires the land to be reclaimed, regraded and replanted. Underground mining follows deeper seams, either leaving pillars of coal to hold the roof or removing whole panels by longwall mining and letting the roof collapse behind; it disturbs less surface land but carries risks of roof falls, methane explosions and subsidence. A lasting problem in southeastern Ohio is acid mine drainage: pyrite (iron sulfide) exposed to air and water in old mines oxidizes to sulfuric acid and dissolved iron, which lowers stream pH and coats stream beds in orange iron hydroxide. Oil and gas extraction requires drilling, and for tight shale, hydraulic fracturing with large volumes of water; the salty wastewater brought back up is often injected into deep disposal wells. That injection has been linked to small earthquakes in eastern Ohio, which shows that extraction costs include effects nobody planned.

The misconception. "Renewable means no environmental cost." Every source has costs: wind and solar farms need land and mined metals, hydroelectric dams flood valleys and trap sediment, and biomass can compete with food crops. The honest comparison includes feasibility, availability and environmental cost across extraction, storage, use and disposal.

Section 2 · ModelWork through the examples

Worked chain efficiency: An electric water heater is 95 percent efficient at the house, supplied by a gas combined-cycle plant at 55 percent with 5 percent transmission loss. Overall efficiency = 0.55 × 0.95 × 0.95 = 0.496, about 50 percent. A gas water heater burning the same gas at home at 80 percent is therefore more efficient overall, because it skips the power-plant conversion. The step students skip is multiplying every stage rather than using only the last one.

Worked coal needed for 1 kWh: 1 kWh = 3.6 MJ. With a plant efficiency of 35 percent, the coal must supply 3.6 ÷ 0.35 = 10.3 MJ. Taking a model energy content of 25 MJ per kg for bituminous coal, the mass burned is 10.3 ÷ 25 = 0.41 kg per kWh. A household using a hypothetical 900 kWh per month would need about 900 × 0.41 = 370 kg of coal per month if all its electricity came from such a plant.

Worked reserve-to-production ratio: A hypothetical region has a coal reserve of 1,200 million metric tons and produces 30 million metric tons per year. R/P = 1,200 ÷ 30 = 40 years. If a new technology makes a further 600 million metric tons profitable, R/P becomes 1,800 ÷ 30 = 60 years; if production doubles to 60 million metric tons per year, the original reserve lasts 1,200 ÷ 60 = 20 years. The ratio changes with both technology and demand, which is why it is not a prediction.

Worked capacity factor: A hypothetical 2.0 MW wind turbine in northwestern Ohio produces 5,200 MWh in a year. Maximum possible = 2.0 MW × 8,760 hours = 17,520 MWh. Capacity factor = 5,200 ÷ 17,520 = 0.297, about 30 percent. It does not mean the turbine was broken 70 percent of the time; it ran at less than full power when winds were light and not at all when calm.

Section 3 · DoPractice, demonstrate, and explain

Representation task: Draw an energy-flow (Sankey-style) diagram for 1,000 MJ of coal becoming light in a home, with arrow widths proportional to energy: 650 MJ lost at the plant, 17.5 MJ lost in transmission and the light stage losing 60 percent of the rest. Label each value. Then draw a cross-section of a gas trap showing source shale, migration path, reservoir sandstone and cap rock, and label where a vertical well and a horizontal well would go.

Safe investigation, measuring efficiency: With a teacher present, fill an electric kettle with 1.00 kg (1.00 L) of tap water, measure the starting temperature, plug the kettle into a plug-in energy meter and let it heat until it switches itself off at the boil. Unplug it, stir with a thermometer, then record the final temperature and the meter reading in kWh. Useful energy = mass × 4,186 J per kg per °C × temperature rise; energy in = meter reading × 3,600,000 J. For example (model values), 1.00 kg heated from 20 to 90 °C gains 293,000 J; if the meter shows 0.10 kWh (360,000 J), efficiency is 81 percent. A meter that reads to 0.01 kWh makes each result uncertain by about 10 percent, so run three trials and compare the mean with the spread. Keep hands away from steam and let the kettle cool before emptying. What the model cannot show: it measures one conversion only, not the losses at the power plant or in transmission.

Independent performance, Eco-House proposal: Choose an Ohio location and design an off-grid house (sketch or blueprint). Success criteria: it names at least three energy sources suited to the site and classifies each as renewable or nonrenewable; it gives an efficiency or capacity-factor figure with its source for each and shows one calculation; it explains the geology the site offers (ground temperature, wind exposure, sunlight, any local fossil fuel); it addresses storage for times without wind or sun; and it states two environmental costs of the chosen system, including one from mining or extraction of the materials.

Section 4 · Check8-question lesson practice test

An adult may read the prompts aloud. Answer independently with words, objects, drawings or a demonstration before opening the answer guide. Award 1 point for a correct result or claim and 1 point for a matching explanation or demonstration; where a question asks only for a result (a corrected sentence, a spelling, a count), a fully correct result earns both points, and the answer guide shows what a complete response contains. Record prompting separately. The total (two points per question) is local practice feedback, not an Ohio proficiency level.

Problem 1

Classify coal, natural gas, wind, sunlight and wood as renewable or nonrenewable, and state the condition that makes wood renewable.

Show worked solution

Coal and natural gas are nonrenewable because they took millions of years to form and are used far faster. Wind and sunlight are renewable because they are replaced continuously by the Sun's energy. Wood is renewable only if forests are regrown at least as fast as they are cut; cut faster than regrowth, it behaves like a nonrenewable resource.

Problem 2

Explain how Ohio's coal formed and why it is found mainly in the eastern and southeastern part of the state.

Show worked solution

Plant material piled up in waterlogged coastal swamps where low oxygen slowed decay, forming peat. Burial under later sediment raised pressure and temperature, driving off water and concentrating carbon, turning peat into bituminous coal. Those swamps existed about 320 to 300 million years ago in the Pennsylvanian period on the edge of the Appalachian Basin, and rocks of that age are preserved at the surface in eastern and southeastern Ohio; western Ohio exposes older rocks that formed before the coal swamps.

Problem 3

Describe the three rock roles needed for a conventional oil or gas deposit and explain why the Utica shale needed new technology.

Show worked solution

A source rock, usually organic-rich shale, where buried organic matter is heated to form oil and gas; a porous, permeable reservoir rock such as sandstone or limestone into which they migrate; and an impermeable cap rock that stops them rising further. In the Utica and Point Pleasant shale the oil and gas stayed in the source rock, which has very low permeability, so vertical wells drained little. Horizontal wells run long distances through the shale and hydraulic fracturing opens cracks, so a single well contacts enough rock to be profitable.

Problem 4

A power plant is 38 percent efficient and transmission loses 6 percent. What percent of the fuel's energy reaches customers, and how much fuel energy is needed to deliver 100 MJ?

Show worked solution

Overall efficiency = 0.38 × 0.94 = 0.357, about 35.7 percent. Fuel energy needed = 100 ÷ 0.357 = 280 MJ. The losses multiply because each stage acts on what the previous stage delivered.

Problem 5

Distinguish a resource from a reserve and explain how a reserve can grow without any new rock forming.

Show worked solution

A resource is a concentration of a material, discovered or not, from which extraction is or could one day be economically feasible; a reserve is the identified part that can be extracted profitably with present technology and prices. A reserve grows when prices rise or technology improves, because material that was too costly becomes profitable, as happened when horizontal drilling and fracturing turned the Utica shale resource into a reserve.

Problem 6

Compare surface mining and underground mining of coal by recovery, land disturbance and safety risk.

Show worked solution

Surface mining removes the overburden and recovers most of a shallow seam, but disturbs large land areas and must be followed by reclamation. Underground mining reaches deeper seams and disturbs less surface land, but leaves some coal in pillars or causes subsidence when the roof collapses, and exposes miners to roof falls and methane. The choice depends mainly on seam depth and the thickness of the overburden.

Problem 7

Explain the chemistry and effect of acid mine drainage in southeastern Ohio streams.

Show worked solution

Pyrite, iron sulfide, in coal and the surrounding rock reacts with oxygen and water when mining exposes it, producing sulfuric acid and dissolved iron. The acid lowers stream pH, which many fish and insects cannot tolerate, and when the water mixes with less acidic water the iron precipitates as orange iron hydroxide that coats the stream bed and smothers habitat. The problem continues from abandoned mines long after mining stops.

Problem 8

A student argues that solar panels are a poor choice because they are only about 20 percent efficient while a gas plant is about 55 percent efficient. Evaluate the argument.

Show worked solution

The comparison ignores what the input is. Sunlight is free, renewable and produces no emissions when converted, so the unconverted 80 percent is not fuel that was mined and burned; the gas plant's losses are losses of a nonrenewable fuel that had to be extracted. A fair evaluation also includes capacity factor, storage needs, land use and the mining of materials for panels, so efficiency alone does not decide the choice.