High school · ScienceAbout 220 minutes
ScienceHigh schoolAbout 220 minutes

Explain reaction rates with collision theory and calculate energy changes with specific heat and bond energies

Several sessions: a safe investigation, modeled examples, independent calculation practice and a written explanation. Atomic masses are used to two decimal places; every investigation uses household or teacher-supplied dilute materials, goggles, and no open flame without a supervising adult.

Ohio learning standards this draft targets

science-2018:C.IM.1

Read the standard text

science-2018:C.IM.1 Chemical reactions

Provisional targets. Clause-by-clause educational review is still pending.

Section 1 · LearnLearn the idea
Potential energy against reaction progress in relative units. Reactants sit at 50 and products at 20, so the reaction releases 30 units and is exothermic. Without a catalyst the activated complex (upper curve) sits at 150, an activation energy of 100; with a catalyst (lower curve) the peak drops to 110, an activation energy of 60. The catalyst lowers the hump and speeds the reaction but leaves the reactant and product energies, and so the 30 units released, unchanged. The horizontal axis has no physical unit.Potential energy against reaction progress in relative units. Reactants sit at 50 and products at 20, so the reaction releases 30 units and is exothermic. Without a catalyst the activated complex (upper curve) sits at 150, an activation energy of 100; with a catalyst (lower curve) the peak drops to 110, an activation energy of 60. The catalyst lowers the hump and speeds the reaction but leaves the reactant and product energies, and so the 30 units released, unchanged. The horizontal axis has no physical unit.Potential energy diagram for an exothermicreaction, with and without a catalyst024681004080120160reactants 50no catalyst 150with catalyst 110products 20progress of reactionpotential energy (relative units)
Potential energy against reaction progress in relative units. Reactants sit at 50 and products at 20, so the reaction releases 30 units and is exothermic. Without a catalyst the activated complex (upper curve) sits at 150, an activation energy of 100; with a catalyst (lower curve) the peak drops to 110, an activation energy of 60. The catalyst lowers the hump and speeds the reaction but leaves the reactant and product energies, and so the 30 units released, unchanged. The horizontal axis has no physical unit.

Learning goal: Use collision theory to explain why concentration, temperature, pressure of gases, surface area and catalysts change the rate of a reaction; draw and read potential energy diagrams with reactants, products, activated complex and activation energy; calculate thermal energy changes with specific heat in calorimetry; and predict whether a reaction is exothermic or endothermic from bond energies and from the flow of energy.

Rate and collisions. The rate of a chemical reaction is the change in the amount of a reactant or product in a given time, such as milliliters of gas per second or grams of solid dissolved per minute. Collision theory explains rates: particles react only when they collide with enough energy to break the necessary bonds and in an orientation that lets the new bonds form. Most collisions fail one test or the other. Anything that increases the number of collisions per second, or the fraction that are effective, increases the rate. Concentration: more particles in the same volume collide more often, so a more concentrated solution usually reacts faster (not always: when something else limits the rate, such as an enzyme or a catalyst surface that is already fully occupied, adding more reactant changes little). Pressure of a gaseous reactant: compressing a gas is the same as concentrating it. Temperature: hotter particles move faster, so they collide more often, and a larger fraction of collisions have energy above the minimum; the second effect is much the larger one, which is why a modest temperature rise can multiply a rate. Surface area: a solid reacts only at its surface, so a powder, with far more surface than a lump of the same mass, reacts faster. A catalyst is a substance that increases the rate without being used up, by providing an alternative pathway with a lower minimum energy so that a larger fraction of collisions succeed; enzymes in cells and the catalytic converter in a car exhaust are examples. Collision theory also explains why reactions between two solids are usually slow while the same substances react faster in solution or in the gas phase, where the particles are free to meet (free to meet does not guarantee fast: a reaction with a high activation energy is slow in any phase), and why a sugar cube dissolves faster when stirred or crushed. Dissolving rate is not solubility: stirring changes how fast sugar dissolves, not how much can dissolve. Mathematical rate laws are reserved for later study.

Potential energy diagrams. A reaction can be drawn as a graph of potential energy against the progress of the reaction. Reactants sit at the left at their energy, products at the right at theirs, and between them is a hump: the activated complex, the unstable arrangement partway between breaking the old bonds and forming the new ones. The height of the hump above the reactants is the activation energy, the minimum collision energy for reaction. If the products lie below the reactants the reaction releases energy and is exothermic; if above, it absorbs energy and is endothermic. A catalyst lowers the hump and leaves the start and end unchanged: it changes the rate, never the energy released. The diagram shows relative energies of reactants (50), activated complex (150 uncatalyzed, 110 catalyzed) and products (20) in arbitrary units, so the activation energy falls from 100 to 60 while the energy released stays 30.

Where the energy comes from. In a chemical system, potential energy is chemical energy stored in the arrangement of bonded atoms, and kinetic energy is thermal energy, the energy of the particles' motion. The total of either cannot be measured, but the change can. Energy must be supplied to break a bond, and energy is released when a bond forms. If the bonds formed in the products are, in total, stronger than the bonds broken in the reactants, the difference leaves the system and the reaction is exothermic; the surroundings warm up. If the bonds broken were stronger than those formed, energy must come in from the surroundings, the reaction is endothermic, and the surroundings cool. Ohio's standard describes molecules with weak bonds, such as ATP in cells, as less stable and tending to react to give more stable products, releasing energy. Read that with the rule above in mind: breaking the bond in ATP still requires energy, and energy is released overall only because the bonds and other interactions formed in the products of its reaction with water are stronger in total than those broken, so the products are more stable under the conditions in a cell. A student who says burning releases energy stored in the bonds of the fuel has the direction backwards: energy is released because stronger bonds form in carbon dioxide and water than were broken.

Bond energies as a prediction tool. A table of average bond energies, in kilojoules per mole of bonds, lets you estimate the energy change. Add the energies of all bonds broken (energy in), add the energies of all bonds formed (energy out), and subtract. For H₂ + Cl₂ → 2HCl, using table values H–H 436, Cl–Cl 243 and H–Cl 432 kJ/mol: broken 436 + 243 = 679 kJ; formed 2 × 432 = 864 kJ; change = 679 − 864 = −185 kJ per mole of reaction. The negative sign means net release, exothermic. For N₂ + 3H₂ → 2NH₃ with N≡N 946, H–H 436 and N–H 390: broken 946 + 3(436) = 2254; formed 6 × 390 = 2340; change −86 kJ, mildly exothermic. Because tabulated values are averages over many compounds, the result is an estimate, and different tables differ by a few kilojoules. Photosynthesis, 6CO₂ + 6H₂O → C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂, breaks strong C=O and O–H bonds and forms weaker C–C, C–H and O=O bonds overall, so it is endothermic and needs light; the combustion of sugar is the exact reverse and releases the same energy.

Calorimetry and specific heat. The energy change of a reaction or a process is measured by letting it warm or cool a known mass of water and applying conservation of energy: the energy lost by one part of the system equals the energy gained by the other. Thermal energy depends on the mass, the temperature and the substance. Specific heat, c, is the energy needed to raise the temperature of one gram of a substance by one degree Celsius. Water's is unusually high, 4.18 J/(g·°C), which is why water heats and cools slowly and helps regulate Earth's climate; copper's is 0.385 and iron's 0.449 J/(g·°C). The relation is q = m × c × ΔT, where q is the thermal energy transferred in joules, m the mass in grams and ΔT the change in temperature, final minus initial. Warming 50.0 g of water by 6.00 °C takes q = 50.0 × 4.18 × 6.00 = 1254 J, or 1.25 kJ to three significant figures. The equation can be rearranged to find any one of q, m, c, ΔT or a starting or final temperature.

A worked model: identify a metal by its specific heat. A 25.0 g piece of metal is heated to 100.0 °C in boiling water (a supervising adult handles the hot water) and dropped into 50.0 g of water at 22.0 °C in an insulated cup. The water warms to 25.4 °C. Energy gained by the water: q = 50.0 × 4.18 × (25.4 − 22.0) = 50.0 × 4.18 × 3.4 = 710.6 J. By conservation the metal lost 710.6 J while cooling from 100.0 to 25.4 °C, a change of 74.6 °C. Its specific heat is c = q / (m × ΔT) = 710.6 / (25.0 × 74.6) = 0.381 J/(g·°C), which is 0.38 to the two significant figures that the 3.4 °C temperature rise allows. That is close to copper's 0.385 and far from iron's 0.449, so the data support copper; they do not prove it, because other metals and alloys have similar specific heats. The method assumes no energy leaked to the cup or the air; a real cup loses some, which makes the calculated value a little low.

Investigation: rates and energy at the kitchen bench. Materials: effervescent antacid tablets, water at three temperatures (cold tap, room, warm tap, not above 50 °C), cups, a timer, a thermometer, baking soda, vinegar, calcium chloride ice-melt pellets from a hardware store, goggles. Part A, rate: drop one whole tablet into 100 mL of water at each temperature and time until fizzing stops; then compare a whole tablet with one crushed into powder in room-temperature water. Part B, energy: record the temperature of 50 mL of vinegar, add a spoon of baking soda and record the lowest temperature reached; record the temperature of 50 mL of water, add a spoon of calcium chloride, stir, and record the highest temperature. Record every time and temperature. A result that supports the claim: the tablet finishes fastest in the warmest water and the crushed tablet finishes faster than the whole one, matching collision theory; the vinegar mixture cools (endothermic) while the calcium chloride mixture warms (exothermic). What the model cannot show: timing the end of fizzing is a rough measure of rate, the temperature changes include energy exchanged with the cup and air, and calcium chloride dissolving is a process rather than a reaction between two compounds. Calcium chloride irritates eyes and skin; wear goggles, do not touch pellets with bare hands and wash up afterwards. No open flame is used.

Section 2 · ModelWork through the examples

Worked example 1 — explain a rate change with collisions. In a hypothetical trial, a strip of magnesium reacts with dilute hydrochloric acid in 90 seconds; the same mass of magnesium powder reacts in 15 seconds; the strip in warmer acid reacts in 40 seconds. Powder exposes far more surface, so more magnesium atoms are available for collisions with acid particles at any moment: faster. Warmer acid has particles moving faster, so collisions are more frequent and, more importantly, a larger fraction carry energy above the activation energy: faster. The amount of hydrogen produced is the same in all three because the same amount of magnesium reacted; only the rate changed.

Worked example 2 — read an energy diagram. A diagram shows reactants at 80 kJ, a peak at 200 kJ and products at 120 kJ (relative values). Activation energy: 200 − 80 = 120 kJ. Energy change: 120 − 80 = +40 kJ, positive, so the reaction is endothermic and the surroundings cool. With a catalyst the peak drops to 150 kJ: activation energy 70 kJ, faster reaction, but the energy change is still +40 kJ because the reactants and products are unchanged.

Worked example 3 — heat from a warm metal to cold water. How much energy is needed to warm 200.0 g of water from 18.0 °C to 65.0 °C? ΔT = 47.0 °C; q = 200.0 × 4.18 × 47.0 = 39 292 J = 39.3 kJ. Reversed: 39.3 kJ transferred into 1.00 kg of iron, specific heat 0.449, gives ΔT = q / (m c) = 39 292 / (1000 × 0.449) = 87.5 °C, so the same energy warms the iron almost twice as much as the water because iron's specific heat is lower.

Worked example 4 — exothermic or endothermic from bond energies. Is 2HCl → H₂ + Cl₂ exothermic or endothermic? Bonds broken: two H–Cl, 2 × 432 = 864 kJ. Bonds formed: H–H 436 and Cl–Cl 243, total 679 kJ. Change = 864 − 679 = +185 kJ: endothermic. It is exactly the reverse of the earlier reaction and the sign flips, as it must. The reactant bonds are stronger than the product bonds, so energy must come in.

Section 3 · DoPractice, demonstrate, and explain

Representation task: two diagrams and a table. Draw one potential energy diagram for an exothermic reaction and one for an endothermic reaction, each labeled with reactants, products, activated complex, activation energy and energy change, and add a dashed catalyzed pathway to the first. Then make a table with rows for concentration, temperature, pressure of a gas, surface area and catalyst, and columns for the effect on the number of collisions per second, the effect on the fraction of effective collisions, and one everyday example.

Independent performance: kitchen-bench rates and energy report. Carry out the investigation and write it up. Success criteria: a data table of times and temperatures with three trials for each condition; an explanation of each rate result using collision theory, naming frequency and energy of collisions; identification of each energy result as exothermic or endothermic with the direction of energy flow stated; a calorimetry calculation of the energy absorbed or released by the 50 mL of liquid in Part B using q = m c ΔT with the specific heat of water as an approximation, with units; a bond-energy calculation for one reaction using values your teacher supplies; and a statement of two sources of error in the temperature measurements.

Section 4 · Check8-question lesson practice test

An adult may read the prompts aloud. Answer independently with words, objects, drawings or a demonstration before opening the answer guide. Award 1 point for a correct result or claim and 1 point for a matching explanation or demonstration; where a question asks only for a result (a corrected sentence, a spelling, a count), a fully correct result earns both points, and the answer guide shows what a complete response contains. Record prompting separately. The total (two points per question) is local practice feedback, not an Ohio proficiency level.

Problem 1

Use collision theory to explain why food spoils faster at room temperature than in a refrigerator.

Show worked solution

Spoilage involves chemical reactions, many of them driven by microbes. At the higher temperature the reacting particles move faster, so they collide more often, and a much larger fraction of collisions carry at least the activation energy needed to break bonds. More effective collisions per second means a higher rate. In the refrigerator fewer collisions reach the activation energy, so the same reactions proceed far more slowly; cooling does not stop them, it slows them.

Problem 2

A catalyst speeds up a reaction. Explain how, and state two things a catalyst does not change.

Show worked solution

A catalyst provides an alternative pathway for the reaction with a lower activation energy, so at the same temperature a larger fraction of collisions have enough energy to succeed and the rate rises. It is not used up, so it appears unchanged at the end. It does not change the energy difference between reactants and products, so the amount of energy released or absorbed is the same, and it does not change how much product can form; it changes only how fast the product forms.

Problem 3

Describe the potential energy diagram for an endothermic reaction and explain what the height of the hump represents.

Show worked solution

Reactants are drawn on the left at a lower energy and products on the right at a higher energy, so the line ends above where it started; the difference is the energy absorbed from the surroundings. Between them the line rises to a peak, the activated complex, the unstable arrangement in which old bonds are partly broken and new ones partly formed. The height of the peak above the reactants is the activation energy, the minimum energy a collision must have for the reaction to occur. Even an endothermic reaction must first climb this hump.

Problem 4

Calculate the energy required to warm 150.0 g of water from 20.0 °C to 80.0 °C, and explain why the same energy would warm 150.0 g of copper by a much larger amount.

Show worked solution

q = m c ΔT = 150.0 g × 4.18 J/(g·°C) × 60.0 °C = 37 620 J, or 37.6 kJ. Copper's specific heat is 0.385 J/(g·°C), less than a tenth of water's, so the same 37 620 J would raise 150.0 g of copper by ΔT = 37 620 / (150.0 × 0.385) = 651 °C. Specific heat measures how much energy a gram of a substance needs per degree; water needs a great deal, which is why it moderates temperature changes.

Problem 5

A 40.0 g metal at 95.0 °C is placed in 80.0 g of water at 20.0 °C; the final temperature is 23.3 °C. Find the specific heat of the metal, say which of copper 0.385, iron 0.449 or aluminum 0.897 J/(g·°C) the data best support, and state how sure you can be.

Show worked solution

Water gained q = 80.0 × 4.18 × (23.3 − 20.0) = 80.0 × 4.18 × 3.3 = 1103.5 J. By conservation of energy the metal lost 1103.5 J while cooling by 95.0 − 23.3 = 71.7 °C. c = 1103.5 / (40.0 × 71.7) = 1103.5 / 2868 = 0.3848, which is 0.38 J/(g·°C) to the two significant figures that the 3.3 °C rise allows. Of the three candidates the data support copper (0.385) and rule out iron and aluminum. They do not prove the metal is copper: a metal or alloy that is not on the list could have a similar specific heat, and any energy that leaked to the cup and the air instead of the water would make the calculated value come out low.

Problem 6

Using bond energies H–H 436, O=O 498 and O–H 464 kJ/mol, decide whether 2H₂(g) + O₂(g) → 2H₂O(g) is exothermic or endothermic and by how much.

Show worked solution

Bonds broken: two H–H (2 × 436 = 872) and one O=O (498), total 1370 kJ in. Bonds formed: four O–H (4 × 464 = 1856) out. Change = 1370 − 1856 = −486 kJ. The negative sign means far more energy is released forming the O–H bonds than was needed to break the reactant bonds, so the reaction is strongly exothermic, releasing about 486 kJ per two moles of water formed. The value is an estimate for the gas-phase reaction as written, because tabulated bond energies are averages; forming liquid water would release more, because condensation also releases energy.

Problem 7

Explain the energy changes in photosynthesis and in the combustion of sugar in terms of bond breaking and bond forming.

Show worked solution

In photosynthesis the strong C=O bonds of carbon dioxide and O–H bonds of water are broken and the C–C, C–H, C–O and O=O bonds of glucose and oxygen are formed; the bonds formed are weaker in total than those broken, so energy must be supplied, from light, and the process is endothermic, storing energy in the products. Combustion of sugar is the reverse: the weaker bonds of glucose and oxygen break and the stronger bonds of carbon dioxide and water form, releasing the stored energy. The same quantity of energy is absorbed in one direction and released in the other.

Problem 8

A student says stirring a sugar solution increases how much sugar can dissolve. Correct the statement.

Show worked solution

Stirring increases the rate at which sugar dissolves, because it brings fresh water into contact with the crystal surfaces and so increases the frequency of collisions between water molecules and the solid; crushing the sugar does the same by increasing surface area. Neither changes the solubility, which is the maximum amount that can dissolve in a given amount of water at a given temperature. Rate of dissolving and solubility are different quantities, and only temperature, among these factors, changes solubility.