Problem 1
What opinion does the model state?
Show worked solution
The reading corner should have a labeled return tray.
ela-2017:W.3.1ela-2017:W.3.1aela-2017:W.3.1bela-2017:W.3.1cela-2017:W.3.1dela-2017:W.3.4ela-2017:W.3.5
ela-2017:W.3.1 Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons.
ela-2017:W.3.1a Introduce the topic or text they are writing about, state an opinion, and create an organizational structure that lists reasons.
ela-2017:W.3.1b Provide reasons that support the opinion.
ela-2017:W.3.1c Use linking words and phrases (e.g., because, therefore, since, for example) to connect opinion and reasons.
ela-2017:W.3.1d Provide a concluding statement or section.
ela-2017:W.3.4 With guidance and support from adults, produce writing in which the development and organization are appropriate to task and purpose. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are defined in standards 1-3 above.)
ela-2017:W.3.5 With guidance and support from peers and adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, and editing. (Editing for conventions should demonstrate command of Language standards 1-3 up to and including grade 3.)
Learning goal: Write an organized opinion for a stated audience, support it with reasons, connect ideas and revise the draft with feedback. An opinion states a judgment or preference that a writer can explain. A reason answers why the writer holds that opinion. Repeating the opinion with stronger words does not add a new reason.
Use this fictional writing task: your class can choose one improvement for its reading corner. Write to classmates recommending a labeled return tray. The task is a proposal for discussion, not an instruction to purchase equipment. Think about the audience's needs: classmates want to find books, return them easily and keep the space usable.
Here is an original model: “Our reading corner should have a labeled return tray. A tray would give borrowed books one clear place to wait before shelving. For example, a reader who is unsure where a book belongs could put it in the tray instead of guessing. The tray would also help our rotating helpers see which books need attention. Since the books would be together, helpers could check them during the daily tidy-up. A labeled tray would make returning and organizing books easier for our class.”
The opening introduces the topic and states the opinion. The next sentences group related ideas: first the reader's return process, then the helpers' organizing work. The final sentence is a concluding statement: it closes the piece by returning to the recommendation and its purpose. The writing does not wander into unrelated complaints about lunch or playground equipment. For an opinion piece, development and organization that suit the task mean these parts: an introduced topic, a stated opinion, grouped reasons with explanations, linking words and a concluding statement. An informative explanation or a narrative would be organized differently because its purpose differs.
The reasons are plausible benefits of the proposal, not results already measured. Words such as would signal what the writer expects. If the writer wanted to claim that a tray had already saved ten minutes every day, actual evidence would be needed. Do not invent measurements just to make an opinion sound persuasive.
Linking words and phrases show relationships. For example introduces a specific illustration of the first reason. Since connects the books being together with the helpers' checking process. Because, therefore and other suitable links can serve different purposes. Choose a link that matches the relationship instead of inserting one into every sentence mechanically.
Revision improves ideas and organization before final editing polishes conventions. A peer might ask, “Who empties the tray?” That question reveals a practical detail the draft can address by naming the rotating helpers and tidy-up time. Another peer might notice that two sentences repeat the same point. Combine them or replace one with a distinct explanation. Revising can involve adding, removing, moving or rewording text.
Worked revision: A weak draft says, “We need a tray. It is good. It would be great.” The last two sentences repeat a positive judgment without explaining it. Revise to “A return tray would give unshelved books one clear place, so readers would not need to guess which shelf to use.” Now the sentence supplies a reason and a consequence relevant to the audience.
Worked conclusion: “That is all” stops the piece but does not connect the ideas. “A labeled tray would make returning and organizing books easier for our class” provides a conclusion related to the actual reasons. A different well-supported conclusion is acceptable; the model is not a sentence to copy in every opinion.
Guided writing: Plan a topic, audience, opinion and two distinct reasons. Add an example or explanation for each. Draft in a logical order, then ask a partner to identify the opinion, reasons and any confusing gap. With adult support, revise the ideas before checking complete sentences, capitalization, spelling and punctuation.
Independent evidence: Write an opinion about a different classroom choice, include linking language and a related conclusion, and submit both an early and revised version. Explain one change made because of feedback. Evaluate relevance and organization as well as conventions; a neatly edited paragraph with no actual supporting reasons still needs revision.
An adult may read the prompts aloud. Answer independently with words, objects, drawings or a demonstration before opening the answer guide. Award 1 point for a correct result or claim and 1 point for a matching explanation or demonstration; where a question asks only for a result (a corrected sentence, a spelling, a count), a fully correct result earns both points, and the answer guide shows what a complete response contains. Record prompting separately. The total (two points per question) is local practice feedback, not an Ohio proficiency level.
What opinion does the model state?
The reading corner should have a labeled return tray.
Why is “It would be great” a weak supporting reason?
It repeats a positive judgment without explaining how the tray would help.
Name two distinct reasons in the model.
The tray gives readers one clear return place and helps rotating helpers identify books needing attention.
What does “For example” do in the paragraph?
It introduces a specific illustration of a reason.
Can the writer claim ten minutes saved daily without measurements?
No. That would invent evidence; predicted benefits should be presented as predictions.
What should the learner submit to show revision?
An early and revised version plus an explanation of a meaningful change, such as clarifying who empties the tray after peer feedback.
How does the model begin and end? Say what the first sentence does and quote the concluding statement.
The first sentence introduces the topic, the reading corner, and states the opinion that it should have a labeled return tray. The concluding statement is “A labeled tray would make returning and organizing books easier for our class.” It closes the piece by returning to the recommendation and connecting both reasons: easier returning for readers and easier organizing for helpers.